The Veteran's claim for service connection for a skin disorder of the hands and feet, claimed as due to chemical exposure during service, is being remanded for further development. A new VA examination by a skin specialist will be conducted.
The deciding factor: The Court found that the November 2007 VA examiner was not a 'physician who specializes in skin disorders' and did not provide sufficient rationale or consider DDT exposure during service when determining the likelihood of a nexus between the Veteran's current condition and his service.
- Claimed conditions
- skin disorder of the hands and feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 14, 2011
- Citation
- 1138454
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1138454.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection for chronic fatigue syndrome and a skin disorder of the hands and feet have been denied as there is no evidence that these conditions were incurred or aggravated by military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's service connection claims, including those for right knee disorder, upper-gastrointestinal (GI) disorder, hypertension, sleep apnea, and others. The TDIU claim is also being considered as a component of these increased rating claims.
- Denied
The Board determined that the Veteran's skin disorder of the hands and feet was not incurred or aggravated in active service, as there were no complaints, findings, treatment, or diagnosis of a skin disorder during his military service. The claim is denied.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, a bilateral shin disability, and a skin disorder of the hands and feet.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.