The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including obtaining a VA medical opinion regarding his employability and obtaining SSA records.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the directives in the September 2009 Remand were not substantially complied with due to the November 2009 VA examiner not providing an opinion on whether the Veteran's service-connected disability renders him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Claimed conditions
- urethral stricture, chronic prostatitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 25, 2011
- Citation
- 1139540
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1139540.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's pelvic floor dysfunction, chronic, with urethral stricture and interstitial cystitis is remanded for further examination to determine its relationship to service. The claim also includes a secondary service connection claim due to his service-connected generalized anxiety disorder.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran contends that the July 1969 rating decision denying service connection for urethral stricture contains CUE and should be reversed to award service connection. The AOJ did not address his contentions in the July 2025 rating decision.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's prostate cancer with prostatectomy, erectile dysfunction, and urethral stricture are all granted service connection. The Veteran's sterility is denied as a symptom of his prostate cancer.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's chronic prostatitis was caused by his in-service renal contusion, and therefore grants service connection for this condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.