The Veteran's skin cancer was not found to be related to his service or herbicide exposure. His eczematous dermatitis is considered a secondary condition and the Board did not find it related to service.
The deciding factor: There is no credible evidence of herbicide exposure during service, and the Veteran's current skin conditions are not presumed due to Agent Orange exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- Melanoma (Skin Cancer), Eczematous Dermatitis
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 9, 2011
- Citation
- 1141712
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1141712.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's allergic rhinitis and eczematous dermatitis on his lower extremities have been granted service connection. The Veteran also received a non-compensable rating for his allergic rhinitis prior to July 14, 2022, and a 10 percent rating thereafter.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are denied due to lack of evidence showing a claim within one year of separation from active duty. The effective dates for service connection have been set at January 15, 2009.
- Granted
The Veteran's PTSD has been rated as 70 percent disabling since January 21, 2009. The other conditions have not met the criteria for higher initial ratings.
- Denied
The veteran's claims for service connection for chronic fatigue, headaches, muscle aches, joint pain, sleep disturbance, depression and irritability, memory loss, duodenal ulcer with rectal bleeding, and eczematous dermatitis were all denied. The claim for duodenal ulcer with rectal bleeding was granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.