Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's neuropathy, mandibular branch of trigeminal nerve, residual from February 2002 oral surgery for extraction of impacted wisdom teeth was not caused by VA carelessness or negligence. The Board finds that the risk of nerve damage during the procedure is a foreseeable event.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's current neuropathy is a known potential consequence of the February 2002 dental surgery, and he was informed of this possibility prior to the procedure.

Claimed conditions
neuropathy, mandibular branch of trigeminal nerve
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 21, 2011
Citation
1142678

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1142678.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.