The VA determined that the Veteran's tinea manuum does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating as it affects less than 5% of his entire body or exposed areas, and has not required intermittent systemic therapy such as corticosteroids.
The deciding factor: The skin condition did not affect at least 5 percent of the Veteran's entire body or exposed areas, nor did it require intermittent systemic therapy such as corticosteroids.
- Claimed conditions
- tinea manuum
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 8, 2011
- Citation
- 1144951
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1144951.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted a 60 percent rating for the Veteran's skin disability, effective November 23, 2020. The decision also determined that an earlier effective date is not warranted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted service connection for tinea manuum, but the issues of skin disability other than tinea pedis and tinea manuum (claimed as exaggerated skin sensitivity) and disability manifested by syncope are remanded due to outstanding VA treatment records and need for additional medical opinions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to non-compliance with prior instructions, requiring further development including obtaining a new VA examination to assess the nexus between the Veteran's diagnosed skin disorders and service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has ordered further examination and opinion regarding the Veteran's skin disorders, specifically dyshidrotic eczema and tinea manuum, to determine if they are related to service exposure to yellowcake uranium. The case is being returned for these actions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.