The Board has remanded the case for further development, including rescheduling a VA examination and addressing whether there is factual evidence that renders it undebatable from a medical standpoint that any current foot disorder pre-existed service or was aggravated during service.
The deciding factor: The Court's memorandum decision mandates further development to address the Veteran's claim of service connection for a chronic foot disorder, including rescheduling a VA examination and addressing the issue of whether there is factual evidence rendering it undebatable that any current foot disorder pre-existed service or was aggravated during service.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic foot disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 9, 2011
- Citation
- 1145089
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1145089.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board found that the appellant's chronic thoracolumbar disability and foot disorder were not incurred during his periods of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) in the Army National Guard. The VA medical opinions concluded that these conditions are more likely related to pre-existing conditions or unrelated to service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and a need for further development, including verification of service periods and obtaining SSA disability benefits information.
- Denied
The veteran's claim for service connection for a chronic foot disorder was denied because he failed to report for a scheduled VA examination without good cause.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board is remanding the case to obtain additional information and evidence, including SSA records and a VA examination for post-operative hemorrhoids. The veteran's claims of reopening his chronic foot disorder claim and increasing his evaluation for post-operative hemorrhoids will be reconsidered.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.