Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Board dismissed the appeals due to the Veteran not filing a timely Notice of Disagreement within one year of the July 2006 rating decision.

The deciding factor: The Veteran did not file a valid Notice of Disagreement on these issues, despite being given an additional opportunity to do so.

Claimed conditions
bilateral pes planus, left foot disorder (presumably left fifth metatarsal fracture and ankle disorder)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 21, 2011
Citation
1146627

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1146627.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.