The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development of his increased rating claim and entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU).
The deciding factor: Additional medical evidence has been received, and the Veteran needs to be evaluated for his service-connected parenchymal liver disease under appropriate diagnostic criteria. The VA also needs to obtain any available VA treatment records from the VAMC in Detroit, Michigan.
- Claimed conditions
- parenchymal liver disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 30, 2011
- Citation
- 1147463
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1147463.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board found no evidence of a current diagnosis or service connection for the claimed conditions, including an acquired psychiatric disorder, osteoporosis, arthritis, esophagitis, GERD, hiatal hernia, and COPD and bronchial asthma with obstruction. The Veteran's STRs did not show any complaints or diagnoses related to these conditions during his military service.
- Granted
The Board has granted the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for residuals of ampullary carcinoma with resulting obstructive jaundice. The case is now remanded for further action on his increased rating claim for parenchymal liver disease.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the veteran's current parenchymal liver disease is related to his in-service treatment for hypercholesterolemia, and thus service connection is granted.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.