The Board found that the Veteran's pre-existing left jaw injury was not aggravated by service, and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
The deciding factor: The VHA expert concluded that the surgery in 1955 did improve or ameliorate the pre-existing jaw condition as evidenced by a doubling of the mandibular range of motion to a normal range of motion (greater than 40 mm), and the Veteran was able to eat a normal diet.
- Claimed conditions
- left jaw injury, posttraumatic deformity of the left mandibular condyle with degenerative changes of the left temporomandibular joint
- How they argued it
- Aggravation of a pre-existing condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 5, 2012
- Citation
- 1200354
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1200354.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to outstanding VA and private treatment records, as well as SSA disability benefits records. The Veteran is also required to undergo a VA examination for his left jaw injury claim and an addendum opinion regarding his left testicle pain. An addendum opinion is needed for his right and left foot claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several claims, including reopening of service connection for right shoulder and left jaw disabilities, increasing ratings for chronic pansinusitis/rhinitis and sleep apnea, and determining entitlement to TDIU. The Veteran is requested to attend a DRO conference.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of heart condition was dismissed as the Veteran withdrew his appeal. The appeals for service connection of bilateral foot condition, left testicle condition, and left jaw injury are remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's right shoulder disability and migraines/chronic headaches are remanded for additional development due to insufficient opinions on the etiology of her conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.