The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a fainting disorder due to lack of evidence of a current disability linked to his in-service incident. The Board found no probative evidence of a chronic or continuing fainting disorder, and the Veteran's lay assertions regarding continuity were not credible.
The deciding factor: There is no probative evidence of a current fainting disorder, and the Veteran's lay assertions as to continuity contradict the detailed medical evidence of record.
- Claimed conditions
- fainting disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 6, 2012
- Citation
- 1200426
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1200426.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and evaluations. The issues include psychiatric disorders, right hand disorder, left hand disorder, fainting disorder, stomach disorder, vertigo, sleep disorder, skin disorder, and renal cysts.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for various conditions including fainting disorder, right arm disorder, heart condition with an irregular heartbeat, high blood pressure, bilateral leg disorder, and acquired psychiatric disorders. The appellant did not have a current diagnosis of any of these conditions at the time of his claims.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development and consideration of his claims, including a VA psychiatric examination.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.