Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran seeks service connection for hypertension and erectile dysfunction as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The Board has determined that a remand is necessary due to the inadequacy of the VA examination report.

The deciding factor: The VA examiner's opinion was based on incomplete information, specifically the lack of private medical records from outside the VA system.

Claimed conditions
hypertension, erectile dysfunction
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 11, 2012
Citation
1200988

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1200988.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.