The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection on a direct basis, finding that his chronic thoracic back strain began during his active duty service.
The deciding factor: The evidence supports the Veteran's contention that he experienced recurrent mid-thoracic strains since injuring his back while on active duty service in May 1990. The Board found credible and competent the Veteran’s reports of symptoms, as well as medical opinions supporting this claim.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic thoracic strain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 17, 2012
- Citation
- 1201754
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1201754.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for an earlier effective date for service connection was dismissed as he did not submit a valid Notice of Disagreement or new and material evidence regarding the effective date.
- Denied
The Board denied a disability rating in excess of 20 percent for the Veteran's lumbosacral strain with chronic thoracic strain, finding that his condition did not meet the criteria for higher ratings based on forward flexion limited to 30 degrees or less or favorable ankylosis of the entire thoracolumbar spine.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeal for a higher disability rating for chronic thoracic strain was denied. A separate disability rating of 20 percent for radiculopathy of the left lower extremity is granted effective November 13, 2018.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's back conditions and their relationship to service. The Veteran contends his current back conditions are related to an in-service injury, but VA records do not support this claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.