The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and a signed statement of his testimony.
The deciding factor: VA needs to obtain missing documents related to the Veteran's claim and ensure they are associated with the claims file before further evaluation can be made.
- Claimed conditions
- prostate cancer, status post radical prostatectomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 18, 2012
- Citation
- 1201883
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1201883.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a total disability based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to an internal discrepancy in the examination report regarding voiding dysfunction and erectile dysfunction, requiring clarification.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the issues of bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and prostate cancer residuals for further development. The Veteran's dermopathy associated with diabetes mellitus, type 2, and diabetes mellitus are already at their maximum schedular ratings.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the Veteran's claims for COPD, bilateral knee disability, and prostate cancer. The claim of service connection for tinnitus was granted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's appeal for further development and to obtain additional medical opinions regarding his service-connected prostate cancer residuals, including a bladder neck contracture. The issues of entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 60 percent for service-connected residuals of prostate cancer and compensation under 38 U.S.C.§1151 for an additional disability as a result of VA-contracted radiation treatments are remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.