The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and conducting a comprehensive eye examination to assess his bilateral aphakia and left eye ptosis.
The deciding factor: The decision requires further evidence and evaluation due to the need for updated medical records and an ophthalmologist's opinion regarding the Veteran's current condition and any relationship between his service-connected conditions and his new issues.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral aphakia, left eye ptosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 30, 2012
- Citation
- 1203222
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1203222.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's TDIU claim is granted from March 22, 2016. Prior to this date, the evidence does not show that his service-connected conditions precluded him from securing and following substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied earlier effective dates for the grants of service connection for various conditions, including migraine headaches, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myasthenia gravis with right upper extremity muscle weakness, and others.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination and failure to address relevant evidence of scarring. The Veteran's left eye ptosis and/or scarring are being examined again to determine if they are related to service.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted the readjudication of the claim for service connection for bilateral aphakia, finding that there is new and relevant evidence to support this claim. ,The appeal to readjudicate the claim of service connection for a mental health disorder was denied as no new and relevant evidence had been submitted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.