The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral foot spurs are not related to his active duty service and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that the Veteran's heel spurs had a recent onset and were not due to service, as evidenced by their absence during service and lack of continuity of symptoms since separation.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral foot spurs
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 30, 2012
- Citation
- 1203311
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1203311.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for unexplained burning sensation, chest pains, itching, headaches, anemia, and bilateral foot spurs due to incomplete development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to an inadequate VA examination and a need for new evidence. The Veteran's bilateral foot spurs are being reviewed again with additional medical opinions and records.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current bilateral foot spurs are not related to his service, and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.