The Board has remanded the case due to questions that warrant additional evidentiary development, including a review of the claims file and an opinion regarding the relationship between the Veteran's current musculoskeletal disorder and service.
The deciding factor: The Board found insufficient evidence in the record to determine whether the Veteran's current musculoskeletal disorder is related to his service or arises from new material evidence submitted since his last denial.
- Claimed conditions
- multiple joint pain, inflammatory arthritis
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 8, 2012
- Citation
- 1204930
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1204930.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for various conditions due to toxic exposure during service, as required by the PACT Act.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for inflammatory arthritis as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to military sexual trauma with borderline personality disorder. However, the claim for service connection for TBI was denied because there is no medical evidence linking the injury to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to missing Social Security Administration (SSA) records and outstanding VA treatment records. The AOJ is instructed to obtain these records and readjudicate the cases.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to outstanding private treatment records and incomplete VA opinions regarding his service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.