The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records and further review of his claim.
The deciding factor: Additional medical evidence is required to support the Veteran's claim for a powered mobility device.
- Claimed conditions
- loss of use of both legs, loss of use of arms
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 9, 2012
- Citation
- 1205031
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1205031.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a pre-decisional error regarding where the Veteran resided since June 1, 2017. The AOJ needs to determine this and adjust the benefits accordingly.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further consideration due to insufficient medical evidence and legal standards not being addressed. The Veteran needs new medical examinations to determine if they meet criteria for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on loss of use of a foot, both feet, or both legs; SMC for aid and attendance; and SMC housebound.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the effective date for the grant of service connection for bilateral hip avascular necrosis with loss of use of both legs is September 25, 2004.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's claimed conditions were not caused by VA medical treatment in April 2005, nor was such aggravated by VA medical treatment or the result of an event not reasonably foreseeable. Therefore, the claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.