The Veteran is seeking compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. � 1151 for an above-the-knee amputation of his left leg, which he claims was caused by a November 2006 VA podiatry treatment that resulted in infection and ultimately required an amputation.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's claim is remanded to obtain additional medical opinions regarding the causation and foreseeability of the above-the-knee amputation resulting from the November 2006 VA podiatry treatment.
- Claimed conditions
- above-the-knee amputation of the left leg
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 7, 2012
- Citation
- 1208710
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1208710.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's loss of the left lower leg, for which he uses a prosthetic limb, is considered a 'static disability.' The Board finds that his continued eligibility for the VA annual clothing allowance should have already been established in previous years and thus filing an application for 2015 was unnecessary. As such, payment of a VA annual clothing allowance for 2015 is granted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining private treatment records and a VA examination to address the claims of negligence in his care.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran seeks service connection for an above-the-knee amputation of the left leg, claimed as secondary to his service-connected shell fragment wound residuals. The case is REMANDED due to incomplete VCAA notice and need for SSA records.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.