Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board denied the appellant's claim for an earlier effective date for a 10% rating for residuals of a right foot injury, finding that the appellant did not provide timely notice to the VA regarding his correct address and thus missed notifications about actions taken on his claim.

The deciding factor: The appellant failed to notify the VA of his current address, leading to the use of an outdated address in correspondence. As a result, he missed notifications about actions taken by the RO.

Claimed conditions
right foot/ankle disability
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
10%
Decision date
March 13, 2012
Citation
1209461

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1209461.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.