The Board has determined that the February 1980 rating decision denying service connection for a right arm and wrist disorder is final. The Veteran's claim of new and material evidence to reopen his nervous disorder claim was denied, but the issue of CUE in the February 1980 rating decision regarding his right arm and wrist condition has been granted.
The deciding factor: The Board found that while there was a clear error in the February 1980 rating decision, it did not manifestly change the outcome as the Veteran's claim for service connection would have likely still been denied based on the evidence at the time of the decision.
- Claimed conditions
- right arm and wrist disorder, nervous disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 23, 2012
- Citation
- 1210786
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1210786.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeal for a higher disability rating for PTSD and effective dates for TDIU and Dependents' Educational Assistance was denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating than 70 percent for PTSD, and denied earlier effective dates for TDIU and Dependents' Educational Assistance.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for an acquired psychiatric disorder to schedule a new VA examination with a psychiatrist or other appropriate medical professional.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a nervous disorder, skin disorder, and TDIU due to the appellant's dishonorable discharge resulting from fraudulent enlistment.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal is dismissed as moot because his Supplemental Claim was granted in full, and there are no remaining issues for appellate consideration.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.