The Board is remanding the case for a new VA medical examination and opinion to determine if the Veteran's current ankle and foot disorders are related to his military service, including any injury he claims to have sustained in 1972. The examiner must consider the Veteran's lay testimony regarding continuous symptoms since service.
The deciding factor: The Board previously denied service connection for bilateral ankle and foot disorders due to an inconclusive VA medical opinion. The new remand requires a more definitive opinion considering continuity of symptomatology since service.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral ankle and foot disorders
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 2, 2012
- Citation
- 1211960
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1211960.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral ankle and foot disorders, finding that there was no evidence of chronic disability resulting from injuries sustained during his military service.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral ankle and foot disorders were not incurred in or aggravated by service, as there is no evidence of a chronic disability during service. The most probative evidence indicates these conditions are unrelated to his military service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.