The Board has remanded the case for further development due to insufficient evidence regarding the cause of the Veteran's right foot hammertoe deformity.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner is asked to determine if the current right hammertoe disability was caused by wearing football shoes one size too small twice a week in practice and in games for approximately one month.
- Claimed conditions
- hammertoe deformity of the right foot
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 6, 2012
- Citation
- 1212740
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1212740.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including obtaining updated medical records and scheduling VA examinations to assess the severity of his service-connected skin and foot disabilities.
- Denied
The Board found that a hammertoe deformity of the right foot was not incurred in or aggravated by service, as there is no evidence of chronicity during service and the Veteran's assertion of continuity of symptoms after service is less credible than the service treatment records.
- Dismissed
The veteran's claims for service connection for right and left foot disorders were dismissed as there is no case or controversy over which the Board has jurisdiction.
- Denied
The veteran's combined disability rating is 50%, which does not meet the criteria for a TDIU. The Board denied his claim as he did not meet the schedular requirements and extra-schedular consideration was also not warranted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.