The Board found that the overpayment of compensation benefits for a dependent spouse was validly created and denied the Veteran's claim for waiver of recovery.
The deciding factor: The effective date of termination of additional benefits for [redacted] was the date of divorce in December 1998, but VA did not become aware of the Veteran's remarriage until September 2006. The overpayment at issue was validly created and properly calculated.
- Claimed conditions
- [redacted]
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 13, 2012
- Citation
- 1213584
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1213584.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Appellant is not entitled to an apportionment of the Veteran's VA compensation benefits for the Veteran's son, [redacted]. The case is being remanded due to a failure to schedule a Travel Board hearing.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an effective date prior to November 1, 2005, for additional compensation for a dependent child based on school attendance was denied as the evidence did not show that a claim was filed within one year of the child's 18th birthday.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the case requires further development due to recent changes in the veteran's compensation benefits and updated financial information. The appellant's claim for apportionment of the veteran's service-connected disability compensation benefits is being remanded for additional review.
- Denied
The appellant's claim for an earlier effective date for DIC benefits for her posthumous daughter was denied as the required evidence had not been submitted within one year of notification.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.