The Board has determined that the Veteran's dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, status post excision, is due to his service in the military and was exposed to herbicides during active duty. As such, presumptive service connection is granted.
The deciding factor: The evidence shows the Veteran served on ACDUTRA in Gagetown, Canada, where herbicide testing occurred, and he has a current diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, which falls under the category of soft-tissue sarcomas that are presumptively service connected due to exposure to herbicides.
- Claimed conditions
- dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 13, 2012
- Citation
- 1213662
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1213662.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have made him in need of regular aid and attendance, which is granted for special monthly compensation.
- Granted
The Veteran's dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans resulted from VA's failure to exercise the degree of care expected, as they did not provide a biopsy in February 2008 when the Veteran was told by a provider that she did not require one. The Board grants compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for TDIU is being remanded due to insufficient evidence of unemployability and the need for a VA examination to assess his ability to secure or follow substantially gainful employment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for initial higher ratings due to the RO's recent increases in disability ratings, and the veteran is seeking further review of his service connection claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.