The Board has remanded the case for further evidentiary development due to an inadequate VA examination. The Veteran's right femur disability is being evaluated again to determine its current severity and impact on his ability to work.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner was unable to provide a comprehensive assessment of the Veteran's right femur disability without resorting to speculation, necessitating another examination.
- Claimed conditions
- Right femur disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 13, 2012
- Citation
- 1213738
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1213738.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for a higher rating for his right knee disability and service connection for lower back and neck disabilities are remanded due to outstanding VA treatment records.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for radiculopathy of the lower extremities and right femur disability, as well as compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a penile disability, are also remanded due to outstanding medical records and further examination is needed.,The Veteran's claim for bilateral loss of sight secondary to his penile implant surgery is being remanded in conjunction with the other claims.,,,
- Denied
The Board denied an earlier effective date for the award of a total disability rating due to individual unemployability (TDIU) due to clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in an August 1995 rating decision, finding that there was no CUE and that the correct facts were not before VA or the statutory or regulatory provisions were incorrectly applied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for additional development due to incomplete examinations and missing records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and examination to assess the severity of the Veteran's right femur disability, tension headaches, and TDIU prior to May 23, 2016.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.