The Veteran's appeal is remanded for issuance of a Statement of the Case on his claim of service connection for pericardial effusion, and for additional development to determine if he meets the schedular requirements for TDIU.
The deciding factor: The Veteran has not yet been granted service connection for pericardial effusion. Additionally, further evidence is needed to determine whether the Veteran's combined disability rating qualifies him for a TDIU on an extraschedular basis.
- Claimed conditions
- pericardial effusion
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 9, 2012
- Citation
- 1216621
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1216621.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for pulmonary heart disease, non-ischemic heart disease, congenital heart defects, pericardial effusion, and pulmonary fibrosis due to new and relevant evidence having been secured.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for pleural effusion, pericarditis, chronic, lung changes, left, lung scarring, left, and pericardial effusion to obtain additional medical evidence.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for a compensable disability rating for pericardial effusion due to latent tuberculosis (claimed as pleural effusion) is dismissed.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for lung condition with scarring (claimed as lung condition due to removal of fiberglass and lung (latent TB)) is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for a new VA medical opinion to address the etiology of the Veteran's heart conditions, specifically his claimed ischemic heart disease (claimed as coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, aneurysm of ascending aorta, aortic stenosis, pericardial effusion, septal thickening, coronary catheterization, and valve surgery).
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.