The Veteran's initial claim for service connection for an eye disorder was withdrawn. The VA has denied the appellant's claims for higher evaluations for his digestive system disability.,For the period prior to May 21, 2007, the VA found that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent. From May 21, 2007 to July 24, 2008, the VA also denied any higher evaluation than 30 percent. However, beginning September 1, 2008, the VA granted a 60 percent rating for the digestive system disability.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not demonstrate symptoms that would warrant an evaluation in excess of 10 percent prior to May 21, 2007. From May 21, 2007 to July 24, 2008, the appellant's digestive system disability was characterized by nearly constant epigastric distress and other symptoms that did not meet criteria for a higher evaluation. Beginning September 1, 2008, the VA found that the appellant's digestive system disability met criteria for a 60 percent rating.
- Claimed conditions
- Gastric Disorder, IBS-like Symptoms
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 60%
- Decision date
- June 28, 2012
- Citation
- 1222570
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1222570.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board found no evidence linking the veteran's left foot disorder or gastric disorder to his military service, and denied both claims.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims to reopen his service connection for thyroid and gastric disorders, finding that new evidence did not provide material support.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.