The Veteran's claim for service connection for a chronic liver disability, claimed as fatty liver condition, including as secondary to HIV and diabetes, is denied. The medical evidence does not establish the presence of a current chronic liver disability.
The deciding factor: There is no established chronic liver disability in the record, despite the Veteran having been diagnosed with a fatty liver condition.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic liver disability, fatty liver condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 2, 2012
- Citation
- 1222939
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1222939.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's service connection claims for trigeminal neuralgia of the right side, kidney stones and chronic kidney disease, and fatty liver condition are denied as there is no evidence of a nexus to in-service uranium exposure.,Service connection was not granted for these conditions due to lack of continuity of symptomatology or evidence linking them to service. The Veteran's current diagnoses were not shown within the applicable presumptive periods.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, duodenal ulcer, hepatitis C, chronic liver disability (secondary to hepatitis C), diabetes mellitus (secondary to sleep apnea), and acquired psychiatric disability (PTSD and depression) have been dismissed.,Service connection has not been established for any of the conditions listed.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a chronic liver disability, gastritis, or esophagitis related to his active service. The kidney condition was not addressed in this decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that further development is needed to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's hypertension, heart condition, and fatty liver condition. The issues are remanded pending adjudication.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.