The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical opinions regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed liver disability and residuals of melanoma. The Veteran is advised to report for any scheduled examinations.
The deciding factor: The Board found that VA had a duty to provide an examination regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed disabilities due to lay statements indicating they may be related to service exposure, but failed to discuss whether such examinations were required under McLendon v. Nicholson (2006).
- Claimed conditions
- Liver disability, Residuals of melanoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 11, 2012
- Citation
- 1224006
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1224006.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's liver disability has not resulted in any compensable symptoms, as he had a previous history of liver disease but is currently asymptomatic.,The Veteran's left ear hearing loss has been rated at noncompensable level due to the absence of more than Level I hearing acuity.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a liver disability as there was no evidence of a current disability at the time of filing or during the pendency of the claim.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for various disabilities, including sinusitis, lung disability, liver disability, kidney disability, sleep apnea, shoulder disabilities, peripheral neuropathy of the extremities, and flatfoot, as there was no evidence to support a link between these conditions and the Veteran's active military service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a liver disability due to the lack of evidence showing a current liver disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.