The Board has ordered additional development due to the need for a VA examination and clarification of opinions provided in prior remands. The Veteran's claim for service connection for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the left tonsillar fossa is being returned to the RO/AMC for further action.
The deciding factor: Additional development is required as per the Board's previous remand directives, including scheduling a VA examination and obtaining clarification on prior opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's adenoid cystic carcinoma.
- Claimed conditions
- adenoid cystic carcinoma of the left tonsillar fossa
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 27, 2012
- Citation
- 1226120
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1226120.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's adenoid cystic carcinoma of the left tonsillar fossa was not present during service or within one year after discharge, and there is no evidence linking it to herbicide exposure. The Board finds that the cancer is not related to service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's adenoid cystic carcinoma of the left tonsillar fossa is being remanded for further development, including obtaining medical opinions regarding its etiology and whether it is related to service or exposure to herbicides.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.