The Board denied service connection for a low back condition, finding no evidence of chronic residuals from any in-service injury or disease. Service connection was also not established for the appellant's tinea versicolor of bilateral feet due to lack of evidence connecting it to his military service.
The deciding factor: There is no medical evidence showing that the appellant experienced a chronic low back condition during his reserve service, and there is insufficient evidence linking any current low back disability to his military service. The Board also found insufficient evidence to establish service connection for tinea versicolor of bilateral feet due to lack of in-service onset or continuity of symptomatology.
- Claimed conditions
- low back degenerative disc disease, tinea versicolor of bilateral feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 7, 2012
- Citation
- 1227139
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1227139.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for low back degenerative disc disease and remanded the claims for a right knee disability, migraine headaches, neck disability, left shoulder disability, and right shoulder disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for low back degenerative disc disease, dry eyes as secondary to right eye pterygium, preglaucoma as secondary to right eye pterygium, and a compensable rating for right eye pterygium due to duty-to-assist errors in obtaining adequate opinions regarding the relationship between the Veteran's conditions and service.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for all issues related to the initial ratings and service connection claims. The Board dismissed the appeal due to the Veteran's withdrawal.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evaluation of the Veteran's low back disability, including lack of range of motion measurements in weight bearing and non-weight bearing conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.