The Veteran was granted service connection for impairment of facial muscles, including the Masseter muscle and Aeragoid muscles from December 20, 1973 to June 1, 1995. He was also granted a compensable rating for impairment of right fifth cranial nerve from December 14, 2006 onward.,The Veteran's service-connected impairment of facial muscles, including the Masseter muscle and Aeragoid muscles were rated at 10 percent from June 1, 1995 to December 14, 2006. He was also granted a compensable rating for impairment of left seventh cranial nerve from December 14, 2006 onward.,The Veteran's service-connected impairment of facial muscles, including the Masseter muscle and Aeragoid muscles were rated at 20 percent from December 14, 2006 onward. He was also granted a compensable rating for impairment of right fifth cranial nerve from December 14, 2006 onward.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's service-connected impairment of facial muscles, including the Masseter muscle and Aeragoid muscles were rated at 10 percent from June 1, 1995 to December 14, 2006 due to interference with mastication.,The Veteran's service-connected impairment of facial muscles, including the Masseter muscle and Aeragoid muscles were rated at 20 percent from December 14, 2006 onward due to inter-incisal movement limited to no greater than 25.4 millimeters and no less than 25 millimeters.,The Veteran's service-connected impairment of right fifth cranial nerve was granted a compensable rating from December 14, 2006 onward due to laceration of the nerve with diagnosed numbness over the right side of his face.,The Veteran's service-connected impairment of left seventh cranial nerve was granted a compensable rating from December 14, 2006 onward due to laceration of the nerve with mild partial paralysis.
- Claimed conditions
- Impairment of facial muscles, Impairment of bilateral fifth cranial nerves, Impairment of left seventh cranial nerve, Impairment of right seventh cranial nerve
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 8, 2012
- Citation
- 1227370
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1227370.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.