Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's claims for higher evaluations were granted, with a 20 percent evaluation assigned for residuals of splenectomy and postoperative ventral hernia. Separate compensable evaluations were also granted for residual scars from shrapnel wounds.

The deciding factor: The VA examination reports supported the current ratings based on the severity of the Veteran's disabilities as currently evaluated.

Claimed conditions
splenectomy, postoperative ventral hernia, residual scar from laparotomy
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
20%
Decision date
August 14, 2012
Citation
1227944

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1227944.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.