The Veteran's TDIU claim was remanded for a VA examination to determine his employability due to service-connected disabilities. The examination found the Veteran unable to work due to multiple service-connected conditions, including diabetes mellitus secondary to herbicide exposure. The issue of service connection for diabetes mellitus as secondary to herbicide exposure is inextricably intertwined with TDIU and must be remanded together.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's diabetes mellitus was found to be secondary to herbicide exposure, which is a recognized risk factor for diabetes.
- Claimed conditions
- multiple fragments wounds, painful scar, paralysis of the internal saphenous nerve of the right lower leg
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- Gulf War
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 23, 2012
- Citation
- 1229053
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1229053.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for SMC based on the need for aid and attendance of another person is being remanded due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error regarding VA treatment records.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the award of service connection for keloid with scarring and secondary infection was denied.,The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the award of service connection for painful scar was also denied.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for a special home adaptation grant as they do not result in anatomical loss or use of both hands, blindness in both eyes, deep partial thickness burns, full thickness or subdermal burns, or residuals of an inhalation injury.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for various disability ratings have been dismissed due to his death. The right eye dyscoria and PTSD issues were pursued under both the Legacy Appeal system and the AMA simultaneously, but these issues are now included in the dismissal.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.