The Board has determined that the grant of service connection for residuals of exotropia at distance and near, status post bilateral lateral rectus resection was not clearly and unmistakably erroneous. The evidence is divided on whether the Veteran's exotropia is congenital or acquired.
The deciding factor: Competent medical opinions indicate both a congenital and an acquired nature for the Veteran's exotropia, making it undebatable that the grant of service connection was not clearly and unmistakably erroneous.
- Claimed conditions
- Exotropia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 14, 2012
- Citation
- 1231718
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1231718.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board denied an earlier effective date for the award of service connection for PTSD and remanded claims related to exotropia, including a compensable rating.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient clarification of the Veteran's left eye visual acuity measurements and the need for additional opinions regarding the nature and etiology of his claimed conditions.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a TDIU due to service-connected disabilities, finding that there is no reasonable possibility of substantiating entitlement to a TDIU and therefore referral for extraschedular consideration is not indicated.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings and service connection is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining an addendum medical opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.