The Veteran's claim for service connection for hyperkeratosis of the hands and initial compensable rating for tinea cruris of the inguinal area, including the legs and feet is being remanded due to further development needed.
The deciding factor: Further examination is required to determine if the current hyperkeratosis of the hands is related to service or represents a new condition.
- Claimed conditions
- hyperkeratosis of the hands
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 25, 2012
- Citation
- 1233181
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1233181.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The veteran's PTSD is currently rated at 50 percent, effective October 31, 2003. Service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus was denied due to lack of evidence showing a direct link to service. Service connection for hyperkeratosis of the hands and feet (due to Agent Orange exposure) was granted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling examinations. The issues of increased rating for hyperkeratosis of the hands and service connection for arthritis of the hands are pending.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.