The Veteran's claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. � 1151 are being remanded due to the need for additional development and a Travel Board hearing.
The deciding factor: The Veteran failed to appear for her scheduled Travel Board hearing, which was granted as it was for good cause.
- Claimed conditions
- recurrent bronchitis/aspiration pneumonia, hiatal hernias and paraesophageal hernias
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 25, 2012
- Citation
- 1233230
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1233230.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran developed hiatal hernias, paraesophageal hernias, and recurrent bronchitis/aspiration pneumonia as a result of VA surgical procedures performed between December 1996 and June 1997. The Board finds that these conditions are not due to the carelessness or negligence of the VA in providing medical treatment.
- Denied
The veteran does not have additional disability of hiatal and paraesophageal hernias as a result of VA treatment, which was not caused by carelessness, negligence, or lack of proper skill.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.