The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining service personnel records and private medical records related to treatment of the Veteran's back since discharge. The VA examiner will provide an opinion on whether the claimed back disability is related to service.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence is needed to determine if the Veteran's current degenerative disc disease is related to his in-service motor vehicle accident and heavy lifting duties, as well as any other relevant factors.
- Claimed conditions
- degenerative disc disease, L5-S1
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 28, 2012
- Citation
- 1233883
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1233883.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's request for additional VR&E equipment purchases and other services under a program of independent living services, including a riding lawnmower, power tools, attending school far from home, childcare, and a vehicle, was denied due to the severity of his service-connected disabilities. The Board has ordered further development to address these issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for left shoulder and back disabilities due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The Veteran's tinnitus claim is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development due to a lack of recent medical examination and updated treatment records. The Veteran's disability ratings for his bilateral knee and lumbar spine conditions are being reviewed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to an inadequate VA examination, and a new one is required for proper evaluation of the Veteran's back disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.