The Veteran's initial claim for a higher rating for his service-connected urethral stricture was granted, and he is currently receiving a 10 percent evaluation. A separate 20 percent evaluation has been assigned for the scar resulting from the urethroplasty.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that the Veteran's complaints of frequency of urination were most likely related to benign prostatic hyperplasia, which was unrelated to his stricture.
- Claimed conditions
- Urethral Stricture
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 17, 2012
- Citation
- 1235952
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1235952.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board denied a disability rating in excess of 70 percent for generalized anxiety disorder, denied compensable ratings for external hemorrhoids and sinusitis, granted service connection for migraine headaches secondary to sinusitis, and granted service connection for left foot and left shoulder conditions. The claims for increased ratings for urethral stricture, lumbosacral strain, and ulnar neuropathy were remanded.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted a rating of 20 percent for the Veteran's erectile dysfunction with urethral stricture, finding that nerve damage from his prostatectomy constitutes an internal penile deformity.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including his cerebral vascular accident residuals and peripheral neuropathy, rendered him in need of aid and attendance prior to July 22, 2016. Since then, he has required assistance due to the severity of his conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss prior to November 4, 2016 was denied. The Board also found that the Veteran's urethral stricture is not service-connected due to lack of evidence linking it to his in-service condition. Both issues are remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.