The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to ensure proper development of the Veteran's claim, including obtaining updated medical records and scheduling an appropriate VA examination.
The deciding factor: The current evidence does not adequately reflect the severity and manifestations of the Veteran's service-connected prostate cancer with erectile dysfunction, necessitating further evaluation and assessment.
- Claimed conditions
- prostate cancer with erectile dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- November 19, 2012
- Citation
- 1239487
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1239487.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's initial service connection claims for prostate cancer with erectile dysfunction and diabetes mellitus associated with herbicide exposure were denied as there is no evidence of prior claims.,The Veteran's mid-abdomen scar, hypertension, and diabetic nephropathy have all been denied.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeal of a proposed reduction in the evaluation for service-connected prostate cancer with erectile dysfunction from 100 percent to non-compensable, as the August 2025 rating decision was not a final decision and did not effectuate a reduction.
- Granted
The Board granted an effective date of December 30, 2019, for service connection for prostate cancer with erectile dysfunction and special monthly compensation based on housebound criteria and loss of use of a creative organ.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's spouse, the caregiver, is found to be unable to complete caregiver training within 90 days of applying for PCAFC benefits. The claim is therefore remanded due to a lack of completion of required caregiver training.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.