The VA examiner concluded that the current asteatotic eczema is not related to the in-service treatment for skin ulcers and secondary infection, finding no nexus between the two.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner's opinion based on review of medical records and clinical evaluation found no evidence linking the Veteran's current condition to his service.
- Claimed conditions
- asteatotic eczema
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 26, 2012
- Citation
- 1240235
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1240235.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for a skin condition and benign prostatic hypertrophy due to inadequate medical opinions. The Veteran's skin conditions include cutaneous sarcoidosis, seborrheic dermatitis, eczema, xerosis, asteatotic eczema, and pityriasis rosea. The Board also found the medical opinions regarding the Veteran's BPH were inadequate.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA medical opinions provided are inadequate and remanded for further development. The Veteran's claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for urethral stricture and associated erectile dysfunction, as well as service connection for asteatotic eczema and/or atopic dermatitis (a skin disability), to include as due to herbicide exposure, are remanded.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not render him unemployable prior to December 27, 2018.
- Denied
The Veteran's skin condition was not manifested during his active service or for many years thereafter, and is not shown to be related to his active service, including herbicide exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.