The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for increased ratings were adjudicated multiple times. The RO granted service connection and assigned initial ratings, but reduced the rating for one condition due to CUE.,Both issues have a mixed disposition as some aspects of each claim are granted while others are denied.
The deciding factor: The effective dates cannot be earlier than the dates specified in the claims or decisions because they were not factually ascertainable that the conditions worsened prior to those dates. The CUE aspect was addressed and a restoration of ratings is granted for one condition.,For the other issue, the RO denied an earlier effective date as it could not be established that the condition worsened before September 23, 1994.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a shell fragment wound to the right wrist, residuals of a shell fragment wound in the suprapubic area
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 20, 2012
- Citation
- 1243617
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1243617.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran requested to withdraw the issue of an increased rating for residuals of a shell fragment wound in the suprapubic area. The Board dismissed this claim as withdrawn.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including a new VA examination and consideration of staged ratings.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased disability rating in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected residuals of a shell fragment wound to the right wrist, finding that these residuals were manifested by pain on range of motion testing and tenderness between the scaphoid and lunate bones.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.