The Veteran's appeal of whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen service connection for undifferentiated type schizophrenia was withdrawn before a final decision could be made. The issue of an increased disability rating in excess of 10 percent disabling for jaw disability is remanded for further development.
The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the issue of reopening service connection for undifferentiated type schizophrenia prior to a final Board decision being issued.
- Claimed conditions
- undifferentiated type schizophrenia, fracture of the right and left mandible with acute and chronic temporomandibular joint disease and irregular mandibular movements
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 7, 2013
- Citation
- 1300459
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1300459.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for a total rating for compensation purposes based on individual unemployability due to service connected disabilities (TDIU) because it did not address Dr. N.O.'s March 2009 evaluation and whether any recommended work environment constitutes a 'protected [work] environment' for the purposes of 38 C.F.R. § § 4.16(a).
- Denied
The Veteran is not competent to handle disbursement of VA funds due to his mental condition, specifically undifferentiated type schizophrenia.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for higher ratings for schizophrenia and cervical spine disability, as well as his claim for TDIU, have been denied because he failed to report for scheduled VA examinations without good cause.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a new VA examination to assess the current severity of his service-connected disabilities and their impact on his ability to secure and follow substantially gainful employment.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.