The Board has determined that there is no evidence to support a finding that the Veteran's Raynaud's Syndrome of the right hand is related to his service, including an in-service injury. The VA examiner concluded that the condition is less likely as not related to his March 1972 injury.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that the Veteran's Raynaud's Syndrome was first diagnosed in 1998 and noted that it has been present bilaterally, which contradicts the theory of a direct service connection based on an in-service injury.
- Claimed conditions
- Raynaud's Syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 11, 2013
- Citation
- 1301270
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1301270.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for PTSD and other specified trauma and stressor related disorder, but dismissed the appeals for Raynaud's Syndrome, insomnia, and other specified trauma and stressor related disorder due to untimeliness of the notice of disagreement.
- Granted
The Veteran's Raynaud's Syndrome disability rating was restored to 60 percent effective January 1, 2020. He is also granted TDIU for the time period from April 5, 2018, to September 20, 2020.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation (SMC) on the basis of aid and attendance due to her service-connected disabilities, which include major depressive disorder, Raynaud's Syndrome, migraine headache, and a sinus disability. The decision is based on the need for regular aid and assistance from another person.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further adjudication due to procedural issues and the need for additional development, including obtaining resumes of VA examiners.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.