The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for TDIU due to inadequate medical opinions and a need for further development, including an examination.
The deciding factor: The Court found that the VA examiner's medical opinions were inadequate as they did not address whether the work environment aggravated the service-connected sebaceous cysts by causing more of them to appear.
- Claimed conditions
- recurrent systemic sebaceous cysts, vision impairment of the right eye
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 50%
- Decision date
- January 22, 2013
- Citation
- 1302363
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1302363.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for diabetes, vision impairment of the right eye, a right shoulder condition, a left shoulder condition, and a right knee condition. The Veteran's claims were not supported by evidence showing in-service exposure to Agent Orange or other presumptive conditions.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for vision impairment of the right eye and Hepatitis C have been dismissed due to his death.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a new VA examination to assess whether the Veteran's service-connected disabilities make him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment.
- Granted
The Board has found new and material evidence to reopen the veteran's claim of service connection for vision impairment of the right eye. The evidence submitted includes reports of visual problems experienced by the veteran, including episodes where his vision suddenly narrowed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.