The Veteran seeks service connection for a back disability. The VA examiner found the Veteran has myofascial lumbar syndrome, but opined that it is not related to service due to an inaccurate factual predicate. The Board finds this inadequate and remands the case for further development.
The deciding factor: The examination report was based on an inaccurate factual predicate regarding the relationship between the current back disability and service.
- Claimed conditions
- myofascial lumbar syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 6, 2013
- Citation
- 1304170
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1304170.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's increased rating for low back disability and earlier effective date are denied. Service connection for bilateral lower extremity sciatic nerve radiculopathy is granted as secondary to the service-connected low back disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for various lower extremity and back disabilities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology. The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is granted, but his other conditions are remanded.
- Granted
The Board granted a 20 percent rating for the Veteran's myofascial lumbar syndrome prior to October 8, 2018 and denied an increased rating thereafter. The effective date remains pending as it is not specified in the decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination reports that did not address functional loss during flare-ups, and a new examination is needed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.