The Veteran is seeking a temporary total disability rating due to pregnancy affecting her service-connected disabilities. The case has been remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records from Dr. B at Flower Hospital.
The deciding factor: The appeal involves the effect of pregnancy on pre-existing service-connected conditions and requires further evidence to determine if the Veteran is entitled to a temporary total disability rating under VA regulations.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of closed right fibula fracture with residual pain, scars of both legs, post surgical abdominal scar
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 26, 2013
- Citation
- 1306543
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1306543.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim of service connection for scars on various parts of his body, finding no evidence to support a link between these conditions and active duty. The psychiatric disability claim is remanded due to insufficient information regarding the claimed stressor.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevented her from obtaining and maintaining substantially gainful employment during the period from September 10, 2009 to April 8, 2010 due to pregnancy.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including scheduling hearings and examinations.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.