The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to address the etiology of pelvic tilt and an evaluation of his service-connected low back disability.
The deciding factor: The case requires further investigation due to unclear claims regarding pelvic tilt and the need for updated evaluations of the Veteran's service-connected conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- Pelvic tilt
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 19, 2013
- Citation
- 1309246
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1309246.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's pelvic tilt and scoliosis are caused by her service-connected thoracic and lumbar spine strain, and thus grants service connection for these conditions as secondary to her service-connected condition.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's pelvic tilt and right lower extremity shortening are not related to his service, as there was no evidence of a chronic disability during service. The current symptoms were first reported many years after service.
- Granted
The veteran's service-connected pelvic tilt and low back and hip pain with degenerative changes of the lumbar spine, as well as residuals of a fracture of the right tibia and fibula, and residuals of a sprained right ankle, were all granted increased ratings. The effective date for these increases is September 26, 2003.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.