The Veteran's initial ratings for service-connected tinea pedis of the bilateral hands and feet have been appealed, and further evaluation is needed to determine appropriate disability ratings.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not provide a percentage of the surface area affected in March 2008, and the Veteran's representative asserts that his condition has worsened since then. Further examination is required to evaluate the current severity of the tinea pedis.
- Claimed conditions
- tinea pedis of the bilateral hands, tinea pedis of the bilateral feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 25, 2013
- Citation
- 1313787
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1313787.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's VA treatment records show that he required regular aid and attendance due to his service-connected disabilities, including chronic valley fever fungus residuals, PTSD with associated mood/affective disorder, sleep apnea, and multiple peripheral neuropathies. The Board granted the claim for an earlier effective date of April 11, 2023, for the award of SMC based on aid and attendance.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for chronic urticaria, but remanded claims for increased ratings and service connection for other conditions.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for bilateral planter fasciitis and remanded the other issues, including a compensable evaluation for tinea pedis of the bilateral feet, service connection for dermatitis, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU).
- Denied
The Board denied a compensable rating for tinea pedis of the bilateral feet and allergic rhinitis as the evidence did not meet the criteria for a 10 percent or higher rating.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.