The Veteran's claims for heart murmur and gynecological disorder (including pregnancy problems and pelvic inflammatory disease) are being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination and opinion. The Board will consider whether these conditions are related to service.
The deciding factor: Further development is required as there is insufficient evidence regarding the etiology of the Veteran's heart murmur and gynecological disorder, including pregnancy problems and pelvic inflammatory disease.
- Claimed conditions
- Heart Murmur, Gynecological Disorder (including pregnancy problems and pelvic inflammatory disease)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 25, 2013
- Citation
- 1313861
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1313861.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that there is not substantial compliance with its remand directives and requires further development for the issues of service connection for a heart disability, an acquired psychiatric disorder, and bilateral restless leg syndrome. The VA medical opinions obtained were inadequate to support the decisions on these claims.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted service connection for generalized anxiety disorder. Service connection is remanded for heart murmur and adenopathy.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection due to new and material evidence. However, these claims are still pending as they require further development.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings of PTSD and bilateral foot disability, as well as service connection for various conditions, were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating for PTSD or bilateral foot disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.